How ALICE goes further down the Rabbit Hole of Particle Physics
I’m convinced that the ease with which I write about something is proportional to how easily I can make a pun out of it… anyway, Physics. Yesterday, in the ALICE experiment at CERN, researchers released a paper detailing a very unexpected find; as when they smashed some protons into each other, the debris that flew out was, for that interaction, unlike anything they’d ever seen before.
The debris I mention are themselves nothing new, they are called ‘strange’ particles and their existence is well known. Nothing strange there (sorry, couldn’t resist). What is unusual is that they are being produced as a result of this reaction. First thing to understand about strange particles is that they are heavier and therefore have more energy than protons do normally, meaning that you would need to supply lots of energy to the things you are colliding in order to produce them. The thing is though, the number of these strange particles produced was not dependent on the energy of the colliding particles. This is like saying that if you were to break rocks against a wall, the number of large pieces you make doesn’t depend on the size of the rock you throw.
It turns out it depends on a property called the ‘multiplicity’ of the produced particles. In this context that basically translates to the number of particles produced in a collision, rather than how much energy you collide the reacting particles with. In comparison, this is like saying you’re more likely to find bigger chunks of rock after you’ve thrown it at a wall if it breaks into more pieces, rather than if you throw a bigger rock. This analogy breaks down slightly if you ask: “Well won’t a bigger rock mean you can get more pieces?”. The response to this is yes, normally, but this is why this experiment is so weird, because that isn’t the main factor in seeing these reactions.
Another question you might reasonably ask is: “K great, protons aren’t rocks, scientists are confused, why does this matter?” as this doesn’t seem to make a big difference outside of this one area of Physics, which is itself pretty niche.
My answer is that this alone isn’t going to change the world, but consider this: when you look at the detail of a painting, each individual brush stroke may seem unimportant or superfluous, and only by stepping back and seeing what they create together can you appreciate what is in front of you.
Sources:
Letter Where The Discovery is Announced